Evidence of Harm (1)

Den idealistiske højesteretsdommer John Deed lader sig overtale til at genoptage en sag om en soldat, der blev syg af en vaccine, som hæren gav ham. Efterhånden som Deed graver i sagen, gør han flere og flere dystre opdagelser. Men den stædige dommer er oppe imod stærke kræfter, der er parate til at gå langt for at forhindre sandheden i at komme for en dag.

Deed risks a constitutional crisis in pursuit of justice for a soldier?s family. Jo Mills asks him to review the withdrawal of Legal Aid funding in the case of the soldier, who committed suicide after being made ill by vaccines given to him by the British Army. Deed is reluctant, as the case has been heard and closed by another judge. His only course is to accuse the other judge of bias. When he does so, he causes consternation in the British government.